Round Solitaire Diamond Engagement Ring - 18k Yellow Gold
18k White Gold
Price upon request
Asscher cut engagement rings carry the architectural depth of Art Deco design in a single octagonal silhouette. Created in 1902 by Joseph Asscher and prized for its distinctive “windmill” flash pattern, the cut combines step-cut clarity with cropped-corner durability. With approximately 25 to 35 percent more visible diamond per dollar than a round, the Asscher is the choice for clients who want vintage glamour and quiet geometric precision over conventional sparkle.
18k White Gold
Price upon request
18k White Gold
Price upon request
18k White Gold
Price upon request
18k White Gold
Price upon request
Book your in-store design consultation today.
Schedule FREE Consultation
18k White Gold
Price upon request
18k White Gold
Price upon request
18k White Gold
Price upon request
18k White Gold
Price upon request
18k White Gold
Price upon request
18k Yellow Gold
Price upon request
18k Yellow Gold
Price upon request
18k Yellow Gold
Price upon request
18k Yellow Gold
Price upon request
18k Yellow Gold
Price upon request
18k Yellow Gold
Price upon request
18k Yellow Gold
Price upon request
18k Yellow Gold
Price upon request
18k Yellow Gold
Price upon request
18k Rose Gold
Price upon request
18k Rose Gold
Price upon request
The Asscher cut is the diamond world’s quietest statement of architectural luxury. Square in outline but octagonal in face — created by deeply cropping all four corners — it belongs to the step-cut family alongside the emerald, meaning its facets run in long parallel rows rather than the radiating chevrons of a brilliant cut. The result is a stone that flashes with a distinctive “windmill” pattern visible from above, a clean architectural symmetry that has made the Asscher the signature shape of Art Deco design for over a century.
A well-cut Asscher carries between 58 and 74 facets arranged in a precise concentric pattern, producing broad flashes of light rather than rapid scintillation. The effect is the visual equivalent of a deep breath — measured, luminous, deliberately understated. For the right wearer, no other cut feels quite like it on the hand.
The Asscher cut was created in 1902 by Joseph Asscher, founder of the Asscher Brothers diamond house in Amsterdam. At the time, no square step cut existed that could deliver real brilliance — the existing options were all flat and lifeless. Asscher’s innovation was a deeper pavilion combined with deeply cropped corners that created the now-iconic octagonal silhouette, while allowing the step facets to throw broader, more dramatic flashes of light than any earlier square cut.
The cut became the defining diamond shape of the Art Deco era, peaking in popularity through the 1920s and 1930s. In 2002, the Asscher company introduced the “Royal Asscher” — a patented update with 74 facets (versus the original 58) and slightly revised proportions, producing additional brilliance while preserving the original cut’s architectural character. Today, both traditional and Royal Asschers continue to be cut to the family’s specifications.
The Asscher’s modern revival mirrors the broader return of vintage and Art Deco aesthetics in engagement ring design. High-profile Asscher engagement rings — most notably Elizabeth Taylor’s, Pippa Middleton’s, and Gwyneth Paltrow’s — have brought the cut renewed cultural visibility over the past two decades. In our Scottsdale, Houston, Dallas, and New York studios, we’ve seen requests for Asscher cuts grow steadily as clients seek alternatives to the more ubiquitous round and oval brilliants.
The cut also offers practical value. Asschers typically cost 25 to 35 percent less per carat than rounds of comparable quality, and their square footprint delivers strong visual presence on the finger when set well.
The Asscher’s clean architectural geometry demands settings that respect its symmetry rather than competing with it. The best Asscher settings are deliberately spare — designed to frame the stone’s deep windmill pattern rather than surround it with distraction.
The classic four-prong solitaire remains the most common setting for Asscher engagement rings. We typically use square or chamfered prong tips that seat into the diamond’s cropped corners, hugging the stone without intruding on its octagonal silhouette. The clean lines of a solitaire mounting let the Asscher’s depth and windmill pattern carry the entire visual weight of the ring.
The bezel solitaire — where a thin band of metal wraps the diamond’s perimeter — has become especially popular for Asschers. The metal frame echoes the diamond’s geometric character while providing exceptional protection. A bezel-set Asscher reads as quietly modern and Art Deco at once: architectural, contained, deliberately precise.
Few cuts pair as naturally with Art Deco-inspired settings as the Asscher. We frequently design Asscher rings with milgrain detailing, geometric filigree, or hand-engraved bands that echo the cut’s 1920s heritage. These elements produce rings that feel authentically of the period — even when crafted with modern precision.
Three-stone settings work beautifully with Asscher centers, traditionally accompanied by tapered baguette or trapezoid side stones that continue the step-cut character across the ring’s face. Hidden halos — where small accent diamonds sit beneath the center and are visible only from the side — are also gaining popularity, adding a hidden dimension of detail without disturbing the Asscher’s signature top-down geometry.
Selecting an Asscher follows the same fundamental logic as selecting an emerald — both are step cuts, and both reveal their clarity and color more honestly than brilliant cuts. But the Asscher’s square outline and deeper proportions introduce a few specific considerations that don’t apply to emeralds.
As with all step cuts, clarity is the most important grade for an Asscher. The long parallel facets act like windows into the stone, and any inclusion sits exposed and visible to the eye. We typically recommend VS2 clarity as the practical minimum for Asschers, with VS1 or VVS2 ideal when budget allows.
For Asscher cuts, we look closely at the inclusion plot on the GIA certificate before recommending any stone. A centrally-located inclusion in a VS1 Asscher can be more visible than an off-center inclusion in an SI1 stone. Inclusion placement matters as much as clarity grade itself — and that’s an evaluation that has to happen with the actual diamond, not just on paper.
The proportions we look for when sourcing Asscher diamonds for our clients are:
The Asscher’s depth is part of what creates its distinctive windmill effect. Don’t be tempted by shallow Asschers — they may show more face-up size but at the cost of the very depth-of-flash that defines the cut. A properly proportioned Asscher reveals layers of windmill geometry that a shallow one simply cannot.
Like the emerald, the Asscher is somewhat forgiving on color. The broad facets create high contrast between light and dark planes, which makes warmer color grades (G, H, even I) often read as cooler and icier than they would on a brilliant cut. For clients balancing budget, we typically recommend prioritizing clarity (VS1 or better) while accepting G-H color, where the savings are meaningful and the visual difference is barely perceptible to the eye.
Designing a custom Asscher engagement ring is a process where every element serves the geometry of the diamond. Restraint is the design principle; precision is the execution standard.
Every Asscher project begins with a private consultation at one of our locations in Scottsdale, Houston, Dallas, or New York. In that first meeting, we explore your vision: the aesthetic you’re drawn to (clean modern solitaire, full Art Deco vintage, bezel minimalism), the lifestyle the ring will live with, and your budget. For Asscher rings specifically, we always discuss faceting style (traditional 58-facet versus Royal Asscher 74-facet) in person before sourcing begins.
With your direction set, we source a curated selection of GIA-certified Asscher cuts that match your criteria — paying particular attention to clarity placement, the depth of the windmill pattern, and the symmetry of the corner crops. You’ll view each candidate in person under multiple lighting conditions, and we’ll show you how the diamond’s depth changes the visible pattern as it moves.
Once the diamond is chosen, our design team creates technical drawings and 3D renderings so you can see exactly how the metal will frame the stone, where the prongs (if any) will seat into the cropped corners, and how the band will flow into the head. We iterate as many rounds as needed until what’s on the screen matches what you’ve imagined.
Production begins with a wax model, allowing a final round of physical adjustments before casting in your chosen precious metal. Our master jewelers then set the stone by hand, seating each prong precisely into the geometry of your specific Asscher — a step that mass-production cannot replicate.
Every Finer ring is handcrafted in the United States by master jewelers with decades of experience. With Asscher cuts, that craftsmanship matters because the geometry leaves nowhere to hide imprecision. A poorly-seated prong, an off-angle bezel, or a misaligned basket reads instantly on an Asscher — the step facets reveal every flaw in the setting just as honestly as they reveal flaws in the diamond.
When you can meet the artisans crafting your ring and watch the prongs being shaped to your specific stone, the difference is measurable. For an architecturally-oriented cut like the Asscher, that level of precision is what separates a ring that wears like an heirloom from one that wears like factory work.
Understanding how the Asscher compares to other popular shapes can help confirm it’s the right choice — or help you identify a shape that suits you better. Each cut carries its own personality and trade-offs.
| Characteristic | Asscher Cut | Emerald Cut | Round Cut |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brilliance & Fire | Distinctive windmill pattern; broad step-cut flashes | Hall-of-mirrors flashes in a longer rectangular field | Maximum possible; the benchmark for sparkle |
| Visual Size | Appears similar to round face-up at same carat weight | Appears 5–10% larger than round at same carat weight | Standard for comparison (1.00 ct ≈ 6.5mm) |
| Clarity Requirements | VS2 minimum — step facets reveal inclusions | VS2 minimum — same step-cut transparency | SI1 is typically fine — brilliance hides inclusions |
| Style Character | Architectural, deeply Art Deco, octagonal silhouette | Architectural, Art Deco, rectangular and elongating | Timeless, traditional, universally flattering |
| Price per Carat | Roughly 25–35% less than round of equivalent quality | Typically 25–35% less than round | Highest per-carat price among popular shapes |
What’s the difference between an Asscher and an emerald cut?
Both are step cuts with cropped corners, but their outlines are different. The Asscher is square (1.00 to 1.05 length-to-width ratio); the emerald is rectangular (1.30 to 1.50 ratio). The Asscher’s symmetry produces a distinctive windmill pattern visible from above, while the emerald’s elongation produces a flatter hall-of-mirrors effect. Both are deeply Art Deco; the Asscher reads as more compact and architectural, the emerald as more elongated and elegant.
What’s the difference between a traditional Asscher and a Royal Asscher?
The traditional Asscher has 58 facets, following the 1902 original design. The Royal Asscher (introduced in 2002 by the Asscher family) has 74 facets and slightly revised proportions, producing additional brilliance while preserving the original windmill character. Royal Asschers are slightly more sparkly; traditional Asschers are slightly more architecturally pure. Both are beautiful — we always show both side-by-side during the selection appointment.
Why does my Asscher need higher clarity than other diamonds?
Step cuts use long parallel facets that act as windows into the stone, making inclusions much more visible than they would be in a brilliant cut. While an SI1 round brilliant can look completely eye-clean, an SI1 Asscher will often show inclusions. We recommend VS2 minimum, ideally VS1 or VVS2, for any Asscher.
How do lab-grown Asscher cut diamonds compare to natural ones?
Lab-grown and natural Asschers are physically, chemically, and optically identical. The difference is origin and price: lab-grown Asschers typically cost 30 to 40 percent less than natural Asschers of the same specifications. For Asschers specifically — where higher clarity grades are essential — the lab-grown price discount can be especially meaningful, allowing clients to afford VVS clarity at a budget that would normally only support VS2 in a natural stone.
The Asscher is for the client who wants Art Deco depth in a single architectural form — a diamond that doesn’t chase sparkle but commands the eye through symmetry, precision, and the unmistakable windmill flash that no other shape produces. Whether you’re drawn to its 1920s heritage, its quiet luxury, or simply the feeling of wearing something so deliberately geometric that it never goes out of style, a custom Asscher engagement ring is a piece designed to read as heirloom from the day you put it on.
At Finer Custom Jewelry, we combine carefully sourced GIA-certified Asscher cut diamonds with master American craftsmanship to design engagement rings whose precision matches the cut they showcase.
Our team in Scottsdale, Houston, Dallas, and New York will walk you through every step of designing your Asscher engagement ring — from the first diamond comparison to the moment you slip it onto the finger that matters most.
Contact us to schedule a private consultation today, and let’s begin designing a ring that’s as unmistakably yours as the love it represents.
We firmly believe that the internet should be available and accessible to anyone, and are committed to providing a website that is accessible to the widest possible audience, regardless of circumstance and ability.
To fulfill this, we aim to adhere as strictly as possible to the World Wide Web Consortium’s (W3C) Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.1 (WCAG 2.1) at the AA level. These guidelines explain how to make web content accessible to people with a wide array of disabilities. Complying with those guidelines helps us ensure that the website is accessible to all people: blind people, people with motor impairments, visual impairment, cognitive disabilities, and more.
This website utilizes various technologies that are meant to make it as accessible as possible at all times. We utilize an accessibility interface that allows persons with specific disabilities to adjust the website’s UI (user interface) and design it to their personal needs.
Additionally, the website utilizes an AI-based application that runs in the background and optimizes its accessibility level constantly. This application remediates the website’s HTML, adapts Its functionality and behavior for screen-readers used by the blind users, and for keyboard functions used by individuals with motor impairments.
If you’ve found a malfunction or have ideas for improvement, we’ll be happy to hear from you. You can reach out to the website’s operators by using the following email
Our website implements the ARIA attributes (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) technique, alongside various different behavioral changes, to ensure blind users visiting with screen-readers are able to read, comprehend, and enjoy the website’s functions. As soon as a user with a screen-reader enters your site, they immediately receive a prompt to enter the Screen-Reader Profile so they can browse and operate your site effectively. Here’s how our website covers some of the most important screen-reader requirements, alongside console screenshots of code examples:
Screen-reader optimization: we run a background process that learns the website’s components from top to bottom, to ensure ongoing compliance even when updating the website. In this process, we provide screen-readers with meaningful data using the ARIA set of attributes. For example, we provide accurate form labels; descriptions for actionable icons (social media icons, search icons, cart icons, etc.); validation guidance for form inputs; element roles such as buttons, menus, modal dialogues (popups), and others. Additionally, the background process scans all of the website’s images and provides an accurate and meaningful image-object-recognition-based description as an ALT (alternate text) tag for images that are not described. It will also extract texts that are embedded within the image, using an OCR (optical character recognition) technology. To turn on screen-reader adjustments at any time, users need only to press the Alt+1 keyboard combination. Screen-reader users also get automatic announcements to turn the Screen-reader mode on as soon as they enter the website.
These adjustments are compatible with all popular screen readers, including JAWS and NVDA.
Keyboard navigation optimization: The background process also adjusts the website’s HTML, and adds various behaviors using JavaScript code to make the website operable by the keyboard. This includes the ability to navigate the website using the Tab and Shift+Tab keys, operate dropdowns with the arrow keys, close them with Esc, trigger buttons and links using the Enter key, navigate between radio and checkbox elements using the arrow keys, and fill them in with the Spacebar or Enter key.Additionally, keyboard users will find quick-navigation and content-skip menus, available at any time by clicking Alt+1, or as the first elements of the site while navigating with the keyboard. The background process also handles triggered popups by moving the keyboard focus towards them as soon as they appear, and not allow the focus drift outside of it.
Users can also use shortcuts such as “M” (menus), “H” (headings), “F” (forms), “B” (buttons), and “G” (graphics) to jump to specific elements.
We aim to support the widest array of browsers and assistive technologies as possible, so our users can choose the best fitting tools for them, with as few limitations as possible. Therefore, we have worked very hard to be able to support all major systems that comprise over 95% of the user market share including Google Chrome, Mozilla Firefox, Apple Safari, Opera and Microsoft Edge, JAWS and NVDA (screen readers), both for Windows and for MAC users.
Despite our very best efforts to allow anybody to adjust the website to their needs, there may still be pages or sections that are not fully accessible, are in the process of becoming accessible, or are lacking an adequate technological solution to make them accessible. Still, we are continually improving our accessibility, adding, updating and improving its options and features, and developing and adopting new technologies. All this is meant to reach the optimal level of accessibility, following technological advancements. For any assistance, please reach out to